DSC-2

Proven Performance. Unmatched Efficiency.

Verified benchmarks on NVIDIA GPUs. 5,907x more cost-efficient than the nearest commercial competitor.

5,907x
More cost-efficient than Toshiba SQBM+
1.67B
Peak spins per second
30M
Variables solved (sparse)
0.00%
Gap on G1 MaxCut (perfect match)

GPU Comparison

Benchmarks run on two NVIDIA GPUs spanning consumer and workstation tiers.

NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti

Consumer — $600 MSRP

  • 16 GB GDDR7 VRAM
  • 70 SMs — Blackwell architecture
  • CUDA 12.8
  • Best performance per dollar

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

Workstation — $6,800 MSRP

  • 48 GB GDDR6X VRAM
  • 142 SMs — Ada Lovelace architecture
  • CUDA 12.4
  • Maximum problem scale & throughput
NVIDIA Inception DSC-2 is a member of the NVIDIA Inception Program — accelerating innovation with NVIDIA GPU computing.

Raw GPU Throughput

Millions to billions of spin-flips per second across dense, sparse, and batched workloads. Every chart shows DSC-2 running on commodity NVIDIA hardware.

Dense QUBO Scaling

Full-density coupling matrices — both GPUs overlaid. Higher is better.

Sparse Scaling (k=6)

Sparse random graphs with degree k=6, up to 30M variables. Log scale on x-axis.

Batched Throughput (RTX 6000 Ada)

Concurrent batch execution — peak 1.67 billion spins/s at N=5K × 100 batch.

MaxCut Accuracy (G-set)

DSC-2 accuracy against Best Known Solutions on standard G-set benchmark graphs.

Instance Variables Best Known DSC-2 (5070 Ti) Accuracy DSC-2 (6000 Ada) Accuracy
G1 PERFECT MATCH 800 11,624 11,624 100.00% 11,624 100.00%
G14 800 3,064 3,057 99.77% 3,061 99.90%
G22 2,000 13,359 13,183 98.68% 13,290 99.48%
G43 1,000 6,660 6,639 99.68% 6,652 99.88%
G55 5,000 10,294 10,116 98.27% 10,200 99.09%

On the RTX 6000 Ada, DSC-2 achieves 99.09% to 100% accuracy across all tested G-set instances. On the $600 RTX 5070 Ti, accuracy ranges from 98.27% to 100%. These results are achieved in milliseconds, not hours.

BKS values from published literature. All DSC-2 results from 10-run best-of with 1000 sweeps.

5,907x More Cost-Efficient

DSC-2 on a $600 consumer GPU outperforms million-dollar quantum annealers by orders of magnitude.

Spins/s per Dollar (log scale)

DSC-2 delivers 5,907x more cost-efficient optimization than the nearest commercial competitor.

246K
Spins/s/$ — RTX 6000 Ada
40.7K
Spins/s/$ — RTX 5070 Ti
42
Spins/s/$ — Toshiba SQBM+
0.01
Spins/s/$ — D-Wave Advantage

Competitive Advantage

How DSC-2 compares across every category of optimization platform.

vs. Quantum Annealers

D-Wave, Toshiba, Fujitsu

  • 5,907x cost efficiency
  • Runs on $600 GPUs
  • No cryogenic infrastructure
  • 30M+ variable capacity

vs. Classical Solvers

CPLEX, Gurobi, Concorde

  • 1.67B spins/s throughput
  • GPU-parallel, not single-threaded
  • Scales beyond their limits
  • 7 solver ensemble

vs. Cloud Quantum Services

IBM Quantum, Braket, Azure Quantum

  • Production-ready today
  • Deterministic, reproducible
  • On-premise available
  • No qubit limitations

DSC-2 is purpose-built for Ising/QUBO-native problems: MaxCut, graph partitioning, scheduling, portfolio optimization, molecular conformation, network design, and resource allocation.

Send Us Your Hardest Problem

We'll benchmark it on DSC-2 for free and deliver full performance metrics within 48 hours.

Free Benchmark View Pricing